![]() |
|||
Allin Cornell Named 2005 Joyner LecturerProfessor Allin Cornell has been named the 2005 William B. Joyner Memorial Lecturer. The lecture, entitled "On Quantifying the Seismology-Engineering Interface" will be given at the EERI Annual Meeting in Ixtapa, Mexico in February and the SSA Annual Meeting in Incline Village, Nevada in April. The Joyner Lecturer is chosen on the basis of outstanding Earth science contributions to the theory/practice of earthquake engineering or outstanding earthquake-engineering contributions to the direction and focus of Earth Science research, together with demonstrated skills of communication at the earthquake-science/earthquake-engineering interface. Bill Joyner was a USGS seismologist who worked closely with the engineering community, including many of us at the Blume Center until his death in 2001. |
Blume Center NewsIn
October 2004, Dr. Renate Fruchter was invited to give a series of guest
lectures on AEC Global Teamwork at Bauhaus University. During the same
trip, she also visited Royal Technical University (KTH) and Skanska Corporation
in Stockholm in October 2004 to strengthen the cooperation and engagement
in the AEC Global Teamwork course CEE222/122 offered every year in Winter
and Spring Quarter at Stanford in collaboration with universities worldwide. |
||
Alumni NewsBlaise Duvernay (MS '01), wife Liza and son Julien welcomed their new family addition, Anna, on November 27 in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Luis
Ibarra (PhD '2004) and his wife Cristina welcomed their third child and
first daughter, Isabel, on December 28. Luis' hopes for an all-male Ibarra
baseball team were dashed, but Cristina was thrilled to finally have a
little girl. |
|||
2005 Blume Distinguished Lecture to be Given by Jeremy IsenbergThe 2005 John A. Blume Distinguished Lecture will be presented on April 7, 2005 by Jeremy Isenberg of Weidlinger Associates. Isenberg's lecture will be on "Civil Engineering Aspects of Homeland Security." Please see the Blume Center website for more information and location or send an email to majordomo@lists.stanford.edu with “subscribe blume_center_seminar” in the body of the email (leave the subject line blank). |
|||
|
An
International Workshop on Performance-Based Design - Concepts and Implementation
was held in Bled, Slovenia, from June 28 to July 1, 2004. The workshop,
co-organized by Peter Fajfar and Helmut Krawinkler and sponsored by the
PEER Center and Slovenian organizations, brought together more than forty
of the leading researchers and engineers from fourteen countries to assess
the state of knowledge and discuss future directions for research and
design practice on issues important for the development and implementation
of performance-based earthquake engineering concepts. |
|||
Blume Website RedesignedThe Blume Center website has been redesigned with more information and easier to use navigation. Please visit the new site at http://blume.stanford.edu. |
Winter 2004 GraduatesThe following students graduated with a Masters Degree in Structural Engineering and Geomechanics in December 2004: Tayakorn Chandrangsu, Sushil Chauhan (Thornton-Tomasetti), Kaustubh Khanvilkar (Thorton-Tomasetti), Seung Bum Kim, Doo Hyun Kwon, Jungwoo Lee (Bureau Veritas), Carlos Machado, Meris Ota, Byoung Sok Shin (Middlebrook & Louie), and Dorian Sulc; Tony Gonzalez received his Masters Degree in the Design-Construction Integration Program. Jorge Ruiz-Garcia (Universidad Michoacana), Jinxing Cheng and Victor Calo received their Doctorates in Structural Engineering and Geomechanics. |
||
Fall StrGeo SeminarsThe
Blume Center had the privilege of hosting several special seminars in
the Fall Quarter. On November 10, Visiting Professor C.H. Loh spoke on
"Structural Health Monitoring : An element of hazard mitigation";
Luca Gusella from the University of Bologna, Italy, spoke on "Object-oriented
Image Understanding and Postearthquake Damage Assessment" on November
29; and Ashraf Habibullah of Computers & Structures, Inc. gave a seminar
on "What can ETABS, SAP, and other CSI programs do for me?"
on December 1. |
Newly Published
|
||
Research SpotlightRate-Dependence in
High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cement-Based Composites for Seismic
Applications INTRODUCTION In
light of the lessons learned from past earthquakes and the advances in
earthquake engineering, critical facilities such as hospitals are in need
of conforming to current earthquake-resistant design specifications. Additionally,
it is desirable for critical facilities to be operable immediately or
very soon after a seismic event. For many such facilities, retrofitting
the structure poses a considerable problem in that the facility should
be allowed to function while the retrofit strategy is being installed.
The need for both continuing functionality during and after an earthquake
necessitates a flexible and portable retrofit strategy that can be put
in place and repaired with minimal disturbance to the facility. HPFRCC MATERIALS The
infill panels for the retrofit system are composed of HPFRCC and reinforced
with welded wire mesh and traditional steel reinforcement. The HPFRCC
material used in this retrofit system is referred to as an Engineered
Cementitious Composite (ECC), which is designed to exhibit steady-state
cracking in uniaxial tension [3, 4], resulting in the formation of multiple,
very fine cracks. The multiple cracking leads to a strain hardening-like
response in direct tension (Figure 2). During the strain-hardening phase
of loading, the fibers in ECC are debonding from the matrix. The strain
hardening response, ductility in tension, and fine multiple-cracking distinguish
ECC from traditional fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC), which typically
softens after initial cracking.
Figure 1: Proposed retrofit system
Figure 3: Test setup
In general, strain rates in reinforced concrete structures may be as high as 0.05 – 0.1 sec-1 during an earthquake [5, 6]. Therefore, to be consistent with these rates and other studies in the literature [7], four strain rates are being considered for this test series: a quasi-static rate of 2 × 10-5 sec-1, a transitional rate of 2 × 10-4 sec-1, and “seismic” rates of 0.02 and 0.2 sec-1. The results from the quasi-static rate will serve as a base for the test series, while the two largest strain rates are intended to bracket the rates that the HPFRCC might experience in an earthquake. For each strain rate, the HPFRCC specimens are subjected to monotonic compression, monotonic tension, and reversed-cyclic tension and compression. The specimens are loaded as shown in Figure 3. Aluminum end caps are attached to the specimens with high strength epoxy. These end caps are then connected to the 55-kip MTS machine with threaded rods. Three LVDTs are attached to the end caps to measure the displacement of the cylinders. PRELIMINARY RESULTS Early results from the strain rate experiments are presented in Figure 4 for two sets of ECC. Since the retrofit system intends to make use of the ductility of these materials, changes in ductility with strain rate are important to note. In tension, the effect of strain rate can be seen in Figure 4(a). At the highest strain rate, the ultimate tensile strength can increase by 50%, while ductility is halved. These trends are also observed in the cyclic behavior shown in Figures 4(b) and 4(c), with the effect seemingly less dramatic in compression but amplified in tension.
Figure
4: The effect of load rate on the (a) monotonic tensile properties of
ECC 1, The
effect of strain rate on the ductility of ECC may impact the structural
performance of reinforced ECC elements such as the panels in the infill
panel retrofit system. Cyclic lateral load tests on reinforced ECC panels
[2] have demonstrated that the structural strength of these panels can
increase as much as 35% relative to similarly reinforced panels made of
concrete. The increase in structural strength is attributed to the ductility
of the ECC (also demonstrated in [8]), since the concrete was 25% stronger
than the ECC in compression. At increasing drift levels, the ECC panels
maintained their integrity, leading to a higher structural strength and
more hysteretic energy dissipation. Consequently, decreases in the ductility
of ECC with increased strain rate will likely limit this potential increase
in strength and hysteretic energy dissipation. SUMMARY & FUTURE WORK Results from
strain rate experiments on HPFRCC materials used in a proposed retrofit
system were presented. Preliminary analysis of ongoing experimental work
has shown that seismic strain rates can have a significant effect on the
strength and ductility of HPFRCC materials. The loss of tensile strain
capacity is of particular importance since this can limit the ability
of the material in combination with reinforcement to increase strength
and to dissipate significantly more hysteretic energy than traditional
reinforced concrete during an earthquake. REFERENCES |
|||